Shame on Biden for Blocking Tennis Champion Novak Djokovic’s Entry into the United States: Time to Rethink America’s Reckless Vax/Jab Policies

By Don Brown

Novak Djokovic is the world’s greatest tennis player. Ranked number one in the world, and a Serbian citizen, Djokovic is also one of the world’s great patriots and advocates for freedom.

Standing alongside a small handful of other brave athletes such as Aaron Rodgers of the Green Bay Packers and Kyrie Irving of the Brooklyn Nets, Novak has bravely said “no” to illegally-forced mandates of experimental COVID-19 vaccines, and has refused to be coerced into accepting the experimental vaccine in his body. 

We might think at this point that the vaccination mandates would no longer be a big deal to Djokovic. After all, in September of 2022, Joe Biden announced in an interview on 60 Minutes that “the pandemic is over.”  Of course, he did.

One would think that for Djokovic, his problems now entering the United States would have been ended with Biden’s pronouncement.

Not so fast. We’re dealing with a Democrat government here.

September 2022, when Biden appeared on 60 minutes to discuss COVID,  was only two months before the Congressional midterms, and by then, the public was sick and tired of hearing about COVID. Thus, political calculations drove Biden’s “it’s over” declaration.

The problem with Biden, and many national Democrats, is they often talk out of both sides of their mouths. 

Back to Novak Djokovic.

Just this week after declaring that “it’s over” the Biden administration denied Djokovic’s entry into the United States.


Because the champ isn’t jabbed with the COVID vax, that’s why.  Djokovic had to withdraw from the BNP Paribas Open, in Indian Wells, California.

What a shame.

So from one side of his mouth, Biden declared the pandemic to be “over.” But from the other side of his mouth, he decrees that legitimate visitors to the United States be subject to a questionable experimental vaccine before entering the country.

So what gives, Mr. Biden? Is the pandemic over, or not? If it’s over like you say, why keep Djokovic out of the country for a tennis tournament?

Biden is far more irrational than our democratic allies. Even Germany and Israel no longer require the jab to visit their countries. In other words, an American visiting Germany and Israel would not have to get the jab before traveling to those countries, but a German or Israeli visiting America would have to get jabbed up.

It’s a matter of double-faced, Democrat hypocrisy in policy. 

As an attorney often handling constitutional law matters, I have personally represented dozens of clients in federal court on various issues surrounding COVID-19 vaccination mandates. 

While Biden, Fauci, and their Democrat media cohorts continue pushing the highly-questionable virtues of the experimental COVID vaccines, the government statistics discovered in the course of litigation, statistics largely ignored by the press and the pro-jab cartel, should cause us to slam on the brakes and ask some hard questions about the vaccines the government continues to push.

We speak, primarily, of the federal government’s own VAERS database,[1] which is a vaccine adverse reaction database put into place in 1990 primarily for the CDC and the FDA to analyze adverse vaccine results. VAERS has been used, on multiple occasions over the years, to shut down vaccine programs with numbers far less alarming than what we have seen with the COVID-19 jabs. For example, the CDC shut down the oral polio vaccine (OPV) in 2000; the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in 1998; the anthrax vaccine in 2004.

Two things about VAERS should be understood.

First, the system involves volunteer reporting of adverse reactions a person may experience shortly after taking a vaccine, namely any type of vaccine. The adverse reactions reported can range from mild reactions, such as itching, watery eyes, or the like, to symptoms more severe, such as paralysis or even death.

The second thing about VAERS: The numbers are vastly underreported, in part because VAERS is a voluntary system mired down in government regulations, which inherently discourages reporting.

A few years ago, just before the COVID outbreak, Harvard conducted a study, funded by the federal government, which concluded that  VAERS numbers are vastly unreported, and in fact, probably amount to 1% or less of the actual numbers.[2]

In other words, most people who are injured after receiving a vaccine don’t report it, nor do most families report questionable deaths of their loved ones. For every death associated in time with a given vaccine, there are probably at least a hundred or more deaths that go unreported. 

Consider these shocking statistics from the federal government’s database concerning VAERS and the COVID vaccines, which we discovered in the course of litigation.  From January 2021 until October 2021, more deaths were reported in association with the COVID vaccines than from every other vaccine combined over 30 years. Let that sink in for a moment. More deaths were reported in a 10-month period, associated with the COVID-19 vaccinations than from every other vaccination, including chicken pox, smallpox, rubella, German measles, etc etc etc, combined over 30 years.

Now does this mean that every one of those deaths was caused by the vaccine? We have no way of knowing because in most cases autopsies are not conducted following death. Nonetheless, the VAERS system has been referred to as the government’s “canary in a coal mine” to alert federal regulators of danger signs associated with any one vaccine.  It was once highly relied upon, and venerated by the government, that is, until the COVID jabs came along. Now they largely ignore it and brush off high, alarming numbers on the COVID shots by saying that VAERS “doesn’t prove anything.”

This is a double-talk argument for situational convenience.

Before the COVID shot came along, other vaccination programs have been shut down or suspended in the past for minuscule numbers comparatively. And yet, the government continues advocating for them, and Biden bans good people from the United States, like 2022 Wimbledon champ Djokovic, insisting that Djokovic accept an experimental vaccine in his body that not even Americans are now required to take.

Now think about that. Just nine months before, the jab-happy Brits admitted Djokovic into the UK, and Djokovic promptly won the greatest of all tennis tournaments, the Wimbledon men’s singles championship. But nine months later, Biden bans him from the United States for a minor tournament in California.

So what gives?

The Djokovic case shows that Biden’s COVID jab policy, like so many of his policies, does not compute.

It is time for Biden to reverse this ridiculous jab policy altogether, and to answer real, hard questions about why COVID vax VAERS data has been suppressed by both the government and its Democrat media lackeys.

It’s time to face the truth about these VAERS statistics.

American lives may depend on it.


[2] – Stating in the summary introduction, “Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).”

Don Brown, a former U.S. Navy JAG officer, is the author of the book “Travesty of Justice: The Shocking Prosecution of Lieutenant Clint Lorance” and “CALL SIGN EXTORTION 17: The Shootdown of SEAL Team Six,” and the author of 15 books on the United States Military, including three national bestsellers. He is one of four former JAG officers serving on the Lorance legal team. Lorance was pardoned by President Trump in November 2019. Brown is also a former military prosecutor, and a former Special Assistant United States Attorney. He can be reached at and on Twitter @donbrownbooks.